Standup9ja - AU collective withdrawal plan from ICC suffers setback as Nigeria kicks against it
The
plan by members of African Union (AU) to collectively withdraw from the
International Criminal Court (ICC) may suffer a setback as Nigeria and
some other countries objected the proposal.
The Minister
of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama, said this in an interview with
the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Friday in Addis Ababa.
Onyeama
explained that there was a strategy adopted by AU for collective
withdrawal from the ICC which Nigeria did not subscribe to.
The minister said that when the issue came up during a meeting, several countries kicked against it.
He said
Nigeria and others believed that the court had an important role to play
in holding leaders accountable, hence Nigeria fully stood by it
“Nigeria is
not the only voice agitating against it, in fact Senegal is very
strongly speaking against it, Cape Verde, and other countries are also
against itthey (AU) do was to set up a committee to elaborate a strategy for collective withdrawal.“And after,
Senegal took the floor, Nigeria took the floor, Cape Verde and some
other countries made it clear that they were not going to subscribe to
that decision,” he said.
According to
him, a number of countries also took the floor to say that they needed
time to study it before they acceded to that position.
He said that Zambia, Tanzania, Liberia, Botswana and host of others were not willing to withdraw from the court.
While
faulting AU position on ICC, Onyeama stressed that each individual
country willingly acceded to the 1998 Rome Statue on the setting up of
the court.
“Each
country free and willingly acceded to the Treaty, and not all of the
members of the AU acceded, each country acceded individually exercising
its own sovereign right.
“So each country, if they want to withdraw has the right to do that individually,
“The issue
is that the AU which was not a party to the Rome Statues which
established the court, should not be developing a strategy for a
collective withdrawal for something that each country entered into
individually.
“Those who feel they want to withdraw should do that individually.”
NAN reports
that in what seems to be a continental domino effect, three African
states in 2016 publicly declared their intention to withdraw from the
court.
The
countries include Brundi, South Africa and The Gambia, with the reports
that Namibia, Kenya and Uganda were contemplating withdrawing from the
ICC
The court
has repeatedly been criticized by African states as an inefficient,
neo-colonial institution of the Western powers to try African countries.
This
argument is supported by the fact that nine of the ten situations under
investigation, with three others under preliminary investigations,
involve African countries.
However, as
noted from a social shorthand by the European Centre for Development
Policy Management (ECDPM), “the rift is often caused by a neat
difference in priorities.
“Where one gives more importance to peace processes, while the other gives more weight to obtaining [international] justice.”
African state parties to the Rome Statute make up the biggest regional membership, comprising 34 of the 124 members.
From 2009, African countries have called for collective withdrawal from the ICC but some countries have pushed back.
No comments:
Post a Comment